Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0359620150270040233
Journal of Korean Knee Society
2015 Volume.27 No. 4 p.233 ~ p.239
Manipulation under Anesthesia for Stiffness after Total Knee Arthroplasty
Yoo Ju-Hyung

Oh Jin-Cheol
Oh Hyun-Cheol
Park Sang-Hoon
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the incidence of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the degree of joint motion recovery after MUA.

Materials and Methods: A total of 4,449 TKAs (2,973 patients) were performed between March 2000 and August 2014. Cases that underwent MUA for stiffness after TKA were reviewed. TKAs were performed using the conventional procedure in 329 cases and using the minimally invasive procedure in 4,120 cases. The preoperative range of joint motion, timing of manipulation, diagnosis and the range of joint motion before and after MUA were retrospectively investigated.

Results: MUA was carried out in 22 cases (16 patients), resulting in the incidence of 0.5%. The incidence after the conventional procedure was 1.2% and 0.4% after the minimally invasive procedure. In the manipulated knees, the preoperative range of motion (ROM) was 102.5¡Æ¡¾26.7¡Æ, and the preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 19 cases, rheumatoid arthritis in two, and infection sequela in one. MUA was performed 4.7¡¾3.0 weeks after TKA. The average ROM was 64.5¡Æ¡¾13.5¡Æ before manipulation. At an average of 64.3¡¾41.3 months after manipulation, the ROM was recovered to 113.4¡Æ¡¾31.2¡Æ, which was an additional 49.9¡Æ improvement in flexion.

Conclusions: The satisfactory recovery of joint movement was achieved when MUA for stiffness was performed relatively early after TKA.
KEYWORD
Knee, Arthroplasty, Stiffness, Manipulation
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø